- 19
- February
Every organization, whether public or private, has carefully designed rules and workflows. But in real situations, when the word "urgent" is invoked alongside "soft-hearted" people who cannot say no, even well-designed regulations get bypassed effortlessly. This creates compounding problems that are hard to fix and keep recurring — this article explores the causes, consequences, and management approaches to stay compliant, responsive, and accurate without hurting anyone's feelings.
A Familiar Scenario — "Can You Handle This First?"
Imagine these common scenarios:
- "Management needs it urgently" — Procurement staff are told to purchase items before a PR/PO has been approved
- "Just do it first, paperwork can follow later" — Goods are received into the warehouse before a goods receipt is created
- "This one can be exempted from the process" — Approval steps are skipped because the approver is unavailable or the wait is unbearable
- "Please just sign it for me" — Approvers sign without reviewing the details, reluctant to refuse the requester
These scenarios occur daily in many organizations. They are not driven by malicious intent but by the pressure of "urgency" combined with the "reluctance to refuse" of those being asked — causing well-established rules to be easily bypassed.
Why Is This Problem So Hard to Solve?
This is a "classic" problem that is hard to solve because multiple factors are intertwined:
1. A Culture Where "Urgent" Is Normal
In many organizations, the word "urgent" is used so frequently that it has become the norm. Everything is urgent, so employees can no longer tell which requests are truly urgent and which simply want things faster. When everything is urgent, nothing is — yet processes keep getting bypassed all the same.
2. "Soft-Hearted" People Are Not Bad People
People who allow process shortcuts usually do not act with bad intentions. On the contrary, they want to help, keep work moving, and avoid conflict with colleagues. But "kindness" without boundaries becomes the organization's weakness.
3. No "System" as an Intermediary
When regulations rely on "people" for enforcement, there will always be days when rules are relaxed. But with a "system" as the intermediary, the awkwardness of refusal diminishes because "it is not me refusing — it is the system that does not allow it."
4. Consequences Are Not Immediately Visible
At the time of bypassing, everything seems fine and work continues. But problems surface later — incomplete documents, mismatched numbers, untraceable audit trails, issues during financial closing, or findings from internal/external auditors.
The Consequences — Far More Than Just "Missing Documents"
Frequent process bypassing has wide-ranging consequences:
| Area | Impact |
|---|---|
| Finance | Budget overruns, expenses exceeding limits, inability to control costs |
| Accounting | System figures do not match documents, delayed book closings, inability to reconcile |
| Warehouse | Physical and system quantities do not match, duplicate orders, or unknown stockouts |
| Auditing | Untraceable actions (missing Audit Trail), flagged as audit findings |
| Morale | Rule-followers feel disadvantaged while shortcut-takers benefit, creating unfairness |
| Organizational Culture | When rule-breaking has no consequences, others follow suit, creating a new norm where "you do not need to follow regulations" |
5 Management Approaches — Compliant, Responsive, and Nobody Gets Hurt
1. Separate "Truly Urgent" from "Wants It Fast"
Organizations should establish clear criteria distinguishing "truly urgent" (Emergency) from "wants it fast" (Urgent Request). For example:
- True Emergency: Machine breakdown halting production, natural disaster, emergency product damage — use pre-defined emergency procedures
- Wants It Fast: Forgot to submit, poor planning, external pressure — must follow normal procedures but can be expedited
Distinguishing between the two helps everyone understand when bypassing is truly justified and when the correct approach is to "follow the process but do it faster."
2. Design a Compliant "Fast Track" Channel
Instead of letting people bypass steps on their own, design a "Fast Track process" that still includes approval but reduces certain steps. For example:
- Instant mobile approvals without waiting for paper signatures
- Set emergency spending limits that managers can approve without committee involvement
- Pre-made emergency forms requiring minimal but complete information
- Require follow-up documentation within 3 business days, with automated reminders
This approach satisfies both speed and accuracy — nobody has to be the "bad guy" who refuses because there is a legitimate alternative.
3. Let the "System" Be the Enforcer, Not "People"
This is the most critical point — when regulations are embedded in the ERP system, staff do not have to decide whether to make exceptions or not:
- The system does not allow goods receipt without an approved PO
- The system does not allow purchase orders that exceed the budget
- The system enforces process sequence: PR → Approval → PO → Goods Receipt → Inspection → Payment
- The system sends instant notifications to approvers, reducing wait times
With the system in control, employees can comfortably respond with "I will process this as fast as possible, but we need to wait for system approval first" — without bearing the pressure personally.
4. Build a "Get It Right the First Time" Culture
Shift the mindset from "regulations slow things down" to "getting it right the first time means no rework later" by:
- Track the "cost of corrections" — Every time a process bypass requires rework, record the time and resources spent and compare with the time to "do it right the first time." The results consistently show that doing it right from the start is always faster.
- Recognize those who follow the rules — Instead of labeling them as "slow workers," recognize them as "thorough workers"
- Share case studies — Tell the whole organization about past incidents where bypassing caused real problems, to build awareness
5. Review Regulations for Reasonableness
Sometimes the problem is not that people bypass steps, but that there are too many unnecessary steps:
- Review which steps are truly necessary and which exist only because "we have always done it this way"
- Reduce approval hierarchy levels for low-value items
- Set maximum approval time per step (SLA) — e.g., approve or reject within 24 hours
- If an approver does not act within the defined time, the system automatically escalates to the next-level approver
Good regulations must be "strict enough to prevent errors, yet flexible enough to be practical"
How Saeree ERP Helps Manage This Problem
Saeree ERP is designed to accommodate both regulatory rigor and real-world operational flexibility:
Workflow Engine — An Unskippable Process Sequence
The Workflow system in Saeree ERP enforces a clear process sequence from purchase requisition, approval, purchase order, goods receipt, and inspection through to payment. Every step is recorded in the system with a complete Audit Trail — no step can be skipped without authorization.
Mobile Approval — Approve Anywhere, Anytime
Approvers can review and approve documents via mobile instantly, without waiting to return to their desks. Wait times drop from days to minutes — work moves fast without skipping steps.
Automated Notification and Escalation System
When a document awaits approval, the system immediately notifies the approver. If no action is taken within the defined timeframe, the system automatically escalates to the next authorized person. No document ever gets stuck on anyone's desk.
Real-time Budget Control
Every time a purchase requisition is created, the system instantly validates the budget. If the amount exceeds the budget, the process cannot continue — preventing budget overruns at the source.
Complete Audit Trail — Who Did What, When
Every action in the system is recorded in detail — who created a document, who approved it, when, and what changes were made — making retroactive auditing easy and transparent.
Regulations will no longer be bypassed when the "system" is the enforcer instead of "people" — everyone can work comfortably without having to be the one who refuses or the soft-hearted one who gives in.
— Saeree ERP Team
Conclusion
The problem of "urgency + soft hearts + excessive rules" is not a people problem — it is a system problem that relies too much on people for enforcement. When we shift control from people to systems, the result is:
- People do not have to be the judges — no pressure, no awkwardness
- Work does not slow down — compliant fast-track channels with instant mobile approvals
- Everything is auditable — complete Audit Trail, no need to circle back and fix issues later
- Organizational culture improves — everyone operates under the same standards, fairly and transparently
If you are interested in Saeree ERP to elevate your organization's management and workflows, you can contact our team for more information.
