- 1
- March
In the enterprise database world, there are two names every DBA knows — Oracle Database, which has dominated the market for over 40 years, and PostgreSQL, which grew from open source to gain recognition as a Mission-Critical database worldwide. This article compares both systems in depth from a DBA perspective — covering Query Optimizer, Partitioning, Replication, and total cost of ownership — to help organizations using PostgreSQL or considering a migration from Oracle make confident decisions.
Overview Comparison Table
| Aspect | PostgreSQL | Oracle Database |
|---|---|---|
| License | Open Source (PostgreSQL License) — free forever, no Per-Core fee | Commercial — Named User Plus or Processor License (starting in the millions of baht) |
| Architecture | Process-per-Connection (fork model) | Shared Memory + Thread-based (SGA/PGA) |
| MVCC | Tuple-level versioning + VACUUM | Undo Segment (Rollback Segment) |
| SQL Standard | Very high SQL:2023 compliance | SQL:2023 + proprietary extensions |
| Max DB Size | Unlimited (tested at petabyte scale) | Unlimited |
| Community | Open-source community + commercial backing (EDB, Crunchy Data, etc.) | Oracle Corporation + Partner ecosystem |
Performance & Query Optimizer
Both PostgreSQL and Oracle use a Cost-Based Optimizer (CBO) to choose query execution plans, but there are key differences:
PostgreSQL Query Planner
- Uses Statistics Collector to store column distribution data via
ANALYZE - Supports Parallel Query since version 9.6 — current (18.x) supports Parallel Seq Scan, Index Scan, Hash Join, Merge Join, Aggregation
- JIT Compilation (LLVM) since version 11 — speeds up queries with complex expressions
- Tune
work_mem,effective_cache_size,random_page_costto directly adjust planner behavior - pg_stat_statements makes it easy to identify slow queries
Oracle Query Optimizer
- Uses Adaptive Query Optimization that can change the plan mid-execution
- SQL Plan Management (SPM) prevents plan regression — locks in good plans
- Real Application Testing (RAT) tests real workloads before upgrading
- AWR (Automatic Workload Repository) automatically stores performance baselines
- More granular Parallel Query — set Degree of Parallelism (DOP) at table, index, or session level
Summary: Oracle has a "smarter" optimizer in terms of Adaptive Plans and Plan Management, but PostgreSQL is sufficient for most workloads — and a skilled DBA can tune it to comparable performance. PostgreSQL's advantage: all features included, no option purchase required.
Partitioning
Data partitioning is critical for ERP systems with tens of millions of records.
| Feature | PostgreSQL 18 | Oracle 23ai |
|---|---|---|
| Range Partition | Supported | Supported |
| List Partition | Supported | Supported |
| Hash Partition | Supported | Supported |
| Composite (Sub-partition) | Supported (multi-level) | Supported (Range-Hash, Range-List, etc.) |
| Automatic Partition | No built-in — requires pg_partman Extension |
Interval Partition automatically creates new partitions when data exceeds a range |
| Partition Pruning | Supported (since PG 11) | Supported |
| Online Partition Management | ATTACH/DETACH without full table lock (PG 14+) | Online Move/Split/Merge Partition |
Replication & High Availability
For ERP systems requiring Disaster Recovery and Zero Downtime, choosing the right replication method is critical.
PostgreSQL
- Streaming Replication — Physical WAL-level replication, built-in since PG 9.0
- Logical Replication — replicate only specific tables or schemas (PG 10+)
- Synchronous Replication — guarantees Zero Data Loss
- Patroni / repmgr — widely used open-source automatic failover solutions
- No built-in Active-Active Multi-Master — requires extensions like BDR (Bi-Directional Replication)
Oracle
- Data Guard — Physical/Logical Standby with automatic Switchover/Failover (requires option purchase)
- Active Data Guard — read from Standby while replicating (requires additional option purchase)
- GoldenGate — Logical Replication across platforms, supports Change Data Capture (CDC)
- RAC (Real Application Clusters) — Active-Active Clustering where all nodes read and write simultaneously (requires option purchase)
Key Point: Many of Oracle's HA features require additional option purchases beyond the base license — RAC, Active Data Guard, and GoldenGate all carry extra costs. PostgreSQL provides Streaming Replication + Logical Replication completely free.
JSON & NoSQL Capabilities
Both systems support JSON but take different approaches:
| Feature | PostgreSQL | Oracle |
|---|---|---|
| Data Type | jsonb — Binary format, indexable, fast query |
JSON type + JSON Duality View (23ai) |
| Indexing | GIN Index on jsonb — full-text search within JSON | Function-based Index, JSON Search Index |
| SQL/JSON Path | Supports SQL/JSON standard (PG 12+) | Supports SQL/JSON standard |
| Unique Feature | jsonb operators (@>, ?, #>) — very easy to use |
JSON Duality View — view relational tables as JSON documents |
PL/pgSQL vs PL/SQL
For DBAs who need to migrate Stored Procedures from Oracle to PostgreSQL, these are the key areas to watch:
| Feature | PL/pgSQL | PL/SQL (Oracle) |
|---|---|---|
| Syntax | Similar to PL/SQL but not 100% identical | Oracle's native language |
| Package | No Package — uses Schema + Extension instead | Supports Package (Header + Body) |
| Autonomous Transaction | No built-in — use dblink or pg_background instead |
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION |
| Exception Handling | EXCEPTION WHEN — similar to PL/SQL |
EXCEPTION WHEN |
| Cursor | Supported — slightly different syntax | Supported — REF CURSOR, SYS_REFCURSOR |
| Bulk Operations | No FORALL — use INSERT ... SELECT or COPY instead |
FORALL, BULK COLLECT |
Migration Tip: When migrating from Oracle to PostgreSQL, tools like Ora2Pg can automatically convert PL/SQL → PL/pgSQL for approximately 80–90% of code. The remaining portion requires manual adjustment, especially for Packages and Autonomous Transactions.
Security
Data security is critical for ERP systems that hold financial data, employee data, and customer data.
| Feature | PostgreSQL | Oracle |
|---|---|---|
| Row-Level Security (RLS) | Built-in (PG 9.5+) — define policies per table | Virtual Private Database (VPD) — requires separate option purchase |
| Encryption at Rest (TDE) | No built-in TDE — use pgcrypto or OS-level encryption |
Transparent Data Encryption — encrypts at tablespace level (requires Advanced Security Option purchase) |
| Audit | pgAudit Extension — logs every SQL statement |
Unified Auditing — more granular, multi-level policy settings |
| SSL/TLS | Supported — enforce SSL per user/database | Supported — Oracle Net encryption |
| Data Masking | Achievable via View + RLS — no built-in masking | Data Redaction — real-time data masking (requires option purchase) |
Monitoring & Tooling
DBAs need good tools to monitor systems — this is where Oracle has a clear advantage, but PostgreSQL's ecosystem is growing rapidly.
| Aspect | PostgreSQL | Oracle |
|---|---|---|
| Performance Stats | pg_stat_statements + pg_stat_activity |
AWR + ASH + ADDM (Automatic Database Diagnostic Monitor) |
| Log Analysis | pgBadger — analyzes logs and generates HTML reports | Oracle Enterprise Manager (OEM) |
| GUI Management | pgAdmin, DBeaver, DataGrip (free/low cost) | Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control (requires Diagnostic Pack purchase) |
| Grafana Integration | Very easy — many ready-made dashboards available | Possible but more complex to set up |
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) — The Real Decision Point
For executives making decisions, the 5-year Total Cost of Ownership is the most important figure:
| Items | PostgreSQL | Oracle Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| License (5 years) | 0 THB | 5–50 million THB+ (depends on core count) |
| Support/Maintenance | 0 (Community) or 0.5–2 million/year (Commercial Support) | 22% of license fee per year |
| DBA Salary | 50,000–120,000 THB/month | 80,000–200,000 THB/month (Oracle DBAs are harder to find) |
| Options/Add-ons | All features included free — Partitioning, Replication, RLS, JSON all included | RAC, Data Guard, Advanced Security, Partitioning all require separate option purchase |
| Infrastructure | Works with any Linux distro, containers, and any cloud provider | Oracle Linux/RHEL recommended — cloud licensing may increase costs |
TCO Summary: For a 2-processor (16-core) server used for 5 years — Oracle Enterprise Edition may cost a total of 10–50 times more than PostgreSQL, depending on the options required. This is the primary reason many organizations are migrating to PostgreSQL.
When to Choose PostgreSQL / When You Still Need Oracle
Choose PostgreSQL When:
- You need to significantly reduce licensing costs
- You want all features at one price — Partitioning, Replication, RLS, JSON all free
- You need flexibility — works with any cloud provider, containers, Kubernetes
- Your workload is mid-to-large OLTP that does not require RAC
- Your DBA team has Linux/Open Source skills and is willing to learn
- You want to avoid vendor lock-in
Still Need Oracle When:
- You require RAC (Active-Active Clustering) — PostgreSQL has no built-in equivalent
- You have large volumes of PL/SQL legacy code that is too costly or difficult to migrate
- You need Adaptive Query Optimization + SQL Plan Management for highly complex workloads
- Your organization already has long-term Oracle support contracts
- You require TDE (Transparent Data Encryption) at the tablespace level
Global Organizations Using PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL won DBMS of the Year 2023 from DB-Engines (score up 22.5%) and continues to grow — currently ranked 4th worldwide behind Oracle, MySQL, and MS SQL Server, with a 16.85% market share. More than 48,000 organizations worldwide run PostgreSQL in production:
| Organization | Use Case |
|---|---|
| Apple | Switched from MySQL in 2010 — default database on macOS Server |
| Instagram (Meta) | One of the largest PostgreSQL deployments in the world — serves hundreds of millions of users daily |
| Spotify | Uses PostgreSQL + Cassandra as core infrastructure for its music platform |
| Netflix | Uses PostgreSQL in backend systems supporting global streaming |
| Uber | Large-scale data management system for ride-sharing |
| Primary database for a top-ranked global community platform | |
| Discord | Chat system supporting millions of concurrent users |
| NASA | Scientific data storage and analysis system |
DB-Engines Ranking (February 2026): Oracle (1,204 pts) → MySQL (868) → MS SQL Server (708) → PostgreSQL (672) → MongoDB — while not yet #1, PostgreSQL is growing fastest among the Top 5 and is on track to surpass MS SQL Server in the near future.
Case Study — TGO Uses PostgreSQL with Saeree ERP for Over 14 Years
Thailand Greenhouse Gas Management Organization (TGO) is one of the government organizations that has used PostgreSQL as the primary database for Saeree ERP since 2011 — over 14 years of PostgreSQL proven in real production:
- Stability — zero downtime from database issues
- Performance — handles all organization users without issues
- Continuous upgrades — upgraded from PostgreSQL 9.x → 12 → 14 → 18 without issues
- License cost = 0 THB throughout 14 years
PostgreSQL is not "free but inferior" — it is an enterprise-grade database with no license fee. What differs from Oracle is the cost, not the quality.
— Saeree ERP Team
Summary
- Oracle remains the "gold standard" — for organizations that need RAC, TDE, Adaptive Optimizer and are willing to pay for licensing
- PostgreSQL has reached enterprise level — with comprehensive features and comparable performance
- TCO is the deciding factor — 5-year Oracle licensing costs can fund a full DBA team + new hardware for PostgreSQL
- Migration is feasible — tools like Ora2Pg significantly reduce migration time
- Stay updated — follow the latest patches to maintain system stability
If your organization is considering migrating from Oracle to PostgreSQL, or needs consulting on database options for an ERP system, feel free to contact our consulting team — free of charge.


