- 25
- April
What is Competency?
Competency is the combination of Knowledge, Skill, and Attribute (or Behavior) that enables a person to perform a job at or above the standard level of expected performance — not just "knowing" or "being able to," but reliably "getting it done" in real work situations.
Quick Answer
Competency = K + S + A — Knowledge (what you know), Skill (what you can do), Attribute (how you behave). Together they are scored on a 1-5 scale and used alongside KPIs in performance reviews. KPI tells you "did they hit the number?" Competency tells you "how did they get there?"
Origin of the Concept
The competency concept was first introduced by David McClelland, a psychologist at Harvard, in 1973 in his paper "Testing for Competence Rather Than Intelligence". He argued that IQ and academic credentials are weak predictors of job success, compared to measuring "behaviors that lead to superior performance." The framework was further developed by Spencer & Spencer (1993) in their book Competence at Work, which became the foundation for competency models used by organizations worldwide today.
Why Organizations Need a Competency Model
Imagine an organization without a competency model — at review time, every manager uses their own criteria. One gives a high score because "the employee is articulate," another gives a low score because "they don't speak much," even when both employees produce the same results. This is exactly the problem competency models were designed to solve.
| Problem When There Is No Competency Model | Impact |
|---|---|
| Each manager uses different evaluation standards | Employees feel evaluations are unfair, morale drops |
| Job descriptions list "duties" but not "expected proficiency" | Wrong hires, wrong promotions |
| No clear promotion criteria | Top performers leave (they see no clear progression) |
| Training plans are not targeted | Training budgets wasted on irrelevant programs |
| Reviews based on KPI alone | You get people who hit numbers but behave poorly — teams fall apart |
3 Types of Competency
Most organizations classify competencies into 3 main types, based on scope and target audience.
| Type | Applies to | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Core Competency (Organizational core) | Everyone — from CEO to support staff | Service Mind, Teamwork, Integrity, Customer Focus |
| 2. Functional / Technical Competency (Job-specific skills) | Specific roles or job families: accounting, IT, sales | Financial Closing, SQL Writing, Market Analysis |
| 3. Managerial / Leadership Competency (Management capabilities) | Supervisors, managers, executives | Strategic Thinking, Coaching, Decision Making |
Some organizations add a fourth type — Behavioral Competency (e.g., Resilience, Adaptability) — but in practice these are usually folded into Core Competency.
Anatomy of a Single Competency
Each competency has 4 building blocks that make it actually measurable, not just a fancy slogan.
- Name — e.g., "Service Mind"
- Definition — what it means in the context of your organization
- Proficiency Level — typically a 1-5 scale (Basic → Expert)
- Behavioral Indicators — observable behaviors at each level (the most important piece — this is what raters use to assign scores)
Example: "Service Mind" — Levels 1 to 5
- 1Basic — answers customer questions per the manual; does not go beyond duty
- 2Developing — listens actively; provides service to standard
- 3Proficient — understands unstated needs; resolves ad-hoc issues independently
- 4Advanced — exceeds expectations; coaches teammates
- 5Expert — designs the organization's service standards; serves as a role model
Competency Dictionary — 15 Items Ready to Use
Below is a competency dictionary suitable for general organizations, broken down into 5 Core + 5 Functional + 5 Managerial — 15 in total. You can customize each item based on your industry and culture.
A. Core Competency (5 items — apply to everyone)
| Competency | Definition | Behavioral Indicator (Level 3 — Proficient) |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Service Mind | Genuine intent to understand and respond to the needs of customers (both internal and external) | Picks up on unstated needs; resolves ad-hoc issues without waiting for instructions |
| 2. Teamwork | Ability to coordinate with colleagues to achieve shared goals | Helps teammates without being asked; adapts to the team's working style |
| 3. Integrity | Operates with honesty, transparency, and adherence to ethics | Owns mistakes openly; reports data accurately; does not conceal work-impacting information |
| 4. Creativity | Ability to generate new approaches that improve work or add value | Proposes new solutions to long-standing problems; evaluates results and iterates |
| 5. Organization Support | Understanding organizational goals and aligning personal work to them | Adapts working methods when direction shifts; helps the team understand strategic intent |
Note: The first four (Service Mind, Creativity, Teamwork, Organization Support) match the core competencies used in the Saeree ERP performance evaluation module, which weights Competency at 30% alongside KPI at 70%.
B. Functional Competency (5 items — sample for Back Office / IT)
| Competency | Definition | Behavioral Indicator (Level 3 — Proficient) |
|---|---|---|
| 6. Financial Reporting | Ability to prepare financial statements per accounting standards and close on time | Closes monthly books within 5 working days; prepares notes without needing rework by supervisor |
| 7. Data Analysis | Ability to gather, analyze, and synthesize data to support decisions | Fluent in tools (Excel/Power BI); turns numbers into actionable recommendations |
| 8. Process Management | Ability to design, improve, and control work processes for efficiency | Maps process flows; identifies bottlenecks; proposes time/cost-reduction improvements |
| 9. IT Literacy | Ability to use the organization's core information systems effectively | Uses ERP/CRM fluently; troubleshoots basic issues; leverages shortcuts and report templates |
| 10. Compliance Awareness | Ability to perform work in line with applicable laws, regulations, and standards | Knows job-relevant regulations (e.g., PDPA, tax); verifies documents before submission |
Functional competencies vary widely by job family. Sales might have "Negotiation" and "Customer Insight"; manufacturing might have "Quality Control" and "Lean Manufacturing"; HR might have "Recruitment" and "Compensation Design".
C. Managerial Competency (5 items — for supervisors and above)
| Competency | Definition | Behavioral Indicator (Level 3 — Proficient) |
|---|---|---|
| 11. Strategic Thinking | Ability to see the big picture, anticipate the future, and plan long-term | Connects departmental work to organizational goals; weighs decisions against 1-3 year impact |
| 12. People Development | Ability to coach, give feedback, and grow team members | Holds regular 1:1s; identifies strengths and growth areas; builds IDPs for direct reports |
| 13. Decision Making | Ability to decide on incomplete data under time pressure | Makes timely decisions with imperfect information; owns outcomes; reviews to improve |
| 14. Change Management | Ability to lead the team through change, reduce resistance, and increase adoption | Communicates the "why" clearly; listens to concerns; plans transition step-by-step |
| 15. Resource Management | Ability to allocate people, time, and budget for maximum impact | Builds department budgets aligned to goals; prioritizes urgent work without burning out the team |
Managerial competencies tie directly to Change Management and ERP Implementation — leaders need every item above to guide their teams through these projects.
KPI vs. Competency — What's the Difference?
People often confuse KPI with Competency, but they are two different tools that work in tandem during performance reviews.
| Dimension | KPI | Competency |
|---|---|---|
| What it measures | Outcomes (What) | Methods / behaviors (How) |
| Unit | Quantitative (%, count, baht) | Levels 1-5 with behavioral indicators |
| Example | Monthly sales of 10 million baht (105% of target) | Service Mind: Level 4 (exceeds expectations) |
| Changes annually? | Yes — driven by yearly business goals | Mostly stable — reflects organizational values |
| Used for | Performance evaluation | Potential, development, promotion |
| Risk if used alone | Numbers-driven employees with toxic behavior — teams break | Well-behaved employees who miss targets |
One-Sentence Summary
KPI answers "Did they hit the number?" — Competency answers "How did they get there?". You need both for the full picture.
Weighting KPI vs. Competency
There is no fixed formula, but three patterns are common across both Thai and global organizations.
| KPI : Competency | Best for | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 80 : 20 | Sales, Production — number-driven roles | Outputs are clear and directly measurable |
| 70 : 30 ⭐ | General Back Office staff — most common pattern | Balances results with behavior |
| 60 : 40 or 50 : 50 | Senior leaders, HR/CSR roles | Behavior and role-modeling weigh as heavily as results |
Saeree ERP defaults to KPI 70% + Competency 30% and can be customized to any ratio. The system also supports Bubble Rating 1-5 from multiple raters (Multi-Rater) to reduce single-manager bias.
Multi-Rater (360 Degree) Assessment
A single manager's score is prone to bias — especially for soft skills like Teamwork or Service Mind, which a manager may not observe in every situation. Multi-Rater or 360 Degree Feedback is the popular remedy, combining inputs from multiple sources.
- Self-Assessment — the employee rates themselves (reveals gaps between self-perception and others' views)
- Manager — direct supervisor (highest weight; closest to the work)
- Peer — teammates (real visibility into collaboration)
- Subordinate — direct reports (when evaluating a manager — reveals leadership)
- Customer — clients (for service roles — reveals Service Mind)
Concrete Scoring & Calculation Example
To make this concrete, here is an evaluation walkthrough for Somsri — a Senior Accountant at an organization that uses KPI 70% + Competency 30% with Multi-Rater weighting (Self 10% + Manager 60% + Peer 30%).
Step 1 — Collect Competency scores from multiple raters
Each rater scores 1-5 against the published Behavioral Indicators. The system then computes a weighted average per competency.
| Competency | Self (10%) |
Manager (60%) |
Peer (30%) |
Calculation | Score (out of 5) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Service Mind | 4 | 3 | 3 | (4×0.10) + (3×0.60) + (3×0.30) | 3.10 |
| Teamwork | 4 | 4 | 4 | (4×0.10) + (4×0.60) + (4×0.30) | 4.00 |
| Integrity | 5 | 5 | 5 | (5×0.10) + (5×0.60) + (5×0.30) | 5.00 |
| Financial Reporting (Functional) |
4 | 4 | — | (4×0.143) + (4×0.857)* | 4.00 |
| Compliance Awareness (Functional) |
3 | 3 | — | (3×0.143) + (3×0.857)* | 3.00 |
* Functional competencies are typically rated by Self+Manager only (peers may not see technical work), so weights are renormalized: Self 10% → 10/(10+60) = 14.3%, Manager 60% → 60/(10+60) = 85.7%
Step 2 — Compute the overall Competency score
= 19.10 / 5 = 3.82 out of 5
= 3.82 / 5 × 100 = 76.40%
Note: some organizations assign different weights to each competency (e.g., Service Mind at 30% while others split the remaining 70% equally). This example uses equal weighting for simplicity.
Step 3 — Compute the KPI score
| KPI | Weight | Target | Actual | % Achievement | Weighted Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Close monthly books on schedule | 40% | Day 5 | Day 6 (avg) | 95% | 38.0 |
| Error rate ≤ 2 entries / month | 30% | ≤ 2 | 1.5 | 100% | 30.0 |
| Management Report within 5 working days | 30% | 5 days | 6.5 days | 80% | 24.0 |
| Total KPI Score | 92.0% | ||||
Step 4 — Combine using the 70 : 30 ratio
= (92.00 × 0.70) + (76.40 × 0.30)
= 64.40 + 22.92
= 87.32%
Step 5 — Map to a grade
| Score Range | Grade | Meaning | Salary Adjustment (example) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 90-100% | A | Outstanding | +8% to +10% |
| 80-89% | B ⭐ | Exceeds Expectations — Somsri 87.32% | +5% to +7% |
| 70-79% | C | Meets Expectations | +3% to +4% |
| 60-69% | D | Needs Improvement | +0% to +2% |
| < 60% | E | Unsatisfactory | 0% or PIP |
What this evaluation tells us about Somsri
- Grade B (87.32%) — exceeds expectations, eligible for a 5-7% salary increase
- KPI 92% > Competency 76.4% — strong on numbers, but behavior has room to grow
- Areas to develop: Service Mind (3.1) and Compliance Awareness (3.0) — feed into next year's IDP (Individual Development Plan)
- Self > Manager on Service Mind (4 vs 3): a perception gap between self and manager — worth addressing in 1:1
- Not yet ready for promotion to team lead — would need Managerial Competencies (Strategic Thinking, People Development) added in the next cycle
5 Steps to Design a Competency Model
- Define vision and core values — Core Competencies must reflect what the organization aspires to
- Interview top performers — pick 3-5 of the best performers per role and analyze the behaviors they have in common
- Write the Competency Dictionary — name, definition, levels 1-5 with behavioral indicators
- Map roles to required competencies — which competencies and minimum levels each role requires
- Embed into the performance system — yearly reviews, recruitment, promotion, and Individual Development Plans (IDP)
This is not a one-and-done exercise — revisit every 2-3 years because organizational values and business strategy evolve.
Common Pitfalls When Adopting Competency
- Too many competencies per role — over 15 means raters lack time to evaluate properly. Aim for 8-12 (Core 4-5 + Functional 3-5 + Managerial 3-5 if applicable)
- Vague behavioral indicators — phrases like "works well" or "is professional" lead to inconsistent scoring. Indicators must describe observable behaviors
- Untrained raters — many managers have never used a competency model. Run workshops before the first cycle goes live
- Using Competency to replace KPI — Competency does not substitute for KPI. They must be used together
- Disconnected from IDP — if assessment results sit in a folder, they are wasted. Tie them to development plans
Related Articles from Knowledge Center
- HR Vocabulary Every Executive Should Know Executive
- Change Management Executive
- ERP Implementation Checklist Implementation
- ERP ROI — Measuring Return on Investment Executive
References
- McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for Competence Rather Than for Intelligence. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14.
- Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance. John Wiley & Sons.
- SHRM — Developing an Organizational Competency Model
- Office of the Civil Service Commission (Thailand) — Competency Framework



